Gumshoe vs Profound
Both platforms help brands measure AI visibility, but they differ in product philosophy and how customers get started.
Feature-by-feature comparison
| Capability | Gumshoe | Profound |
|---|---|---|
| Product approach | Self-serve, product-led | Enterprise sales-led |
| Testing methodology | Persona-driven API conversations | Enterprise dashboard analytics |
| Content generation | Built-in, insight-backed | Not included |
| Persona analysis | Deep buyer persona simulation | Not included |
| Dashboards | Focused reporting | Comprehensive enterprise dashboards |
| Page-level audit | 5-category AIO scoring | Not included |
| Free tier | First report free | No free tier |
| Entry price | $0.10/conversation | Enterprise pricing |
Why teams choose Gumshoe
- Self-serve platform lets you start immediately without a sales process
- Pay-per-conversation pricing scales with your needs
- Persona-driven methodology simulates real buyer conversations, not just keyword tracking
- Built-in content generation closes the loop from insight to action
- First report is free so you can evaluate before committing
Where Profound stands out
- Strong enterprise credibility and established brand in the category
- Comprehensive dashboards built for enterprise reporting workflows
- Category legitimacy as a recognized leader in AI visibility
- Deep enterprise sales and support infrastructure
The bottom line
Profound is the biggest category-legitimacy competitor with strong enterprise positioning and comprehensive dashboards. Gumshoe takes a product-led, self-serve approach with persona-driven methodology and built-in content generation.
The best way to decide is to try both. Gumshoe's first report is free with no credit card required.
See the Gumshoe difference for yourself
Run your first AI visibility report for free.
Free to start ยท No credit card required